Polity
2017
Emergency Provisions
Union and State
Which of the following are not necessarily the consequences of the proclamation of the President’s rule in a State?
- Dissolution of the State Legislative Assembly
- Removal of the Council of Ministers in the State
- Dissolution of the local bodies
Select the correct answer using the code given below:
B.1 and 3 only
A.1 and 2 only
D.1,2 and 3
C.2 and 3 only
Correct Answer: Option B
When President's Rule is imposed in a state under Article 356, the following consequences may occur:
- The President can either suspend or dissolve the State Legislative Assembly. Therefore, dissolution is not a necessary consequence.
- The Council of Ministers is always removed.
- There is no dissolution of local bodies (e.g., Municipalities, Panchayats) after the proclamation of President's Rule.
Therefore: Statement 1 is not necessarily a consequence. Statement 2 is always a consequence. Statement 3 is not a consequence.
Hence, option (b) is the correct answer.
More Polity Questions
Which one of the following is not a feature of Indian federalism?Polity · 2017Which of the following are regarded as the main features of the “Rule of Law”?Polity · 2018Consider the following statements in respect of election to the President of India :Polity · 2023With reference to the Union Government consider the following statements.Polity · 2015Which of the following statements about the Ethics Committee in the Lok Sabha are correct?Polity · 2024